The vOICe at Tucson 2002

This page contains Realplayer audio files « The vOICe Home Page
« The vOICe for Windows

Two invited presentations on seeing with sound by means of The vOICe were given in the plenary opening session on "Sensory Substitution I: Visual Consciousness in Blind Subjects?" (together with Paul Bach-y-Rita, and chaired by  David Chalmers) on Monday April 8, 2002, at the  Tucson 2002 conference ``Toward a Science of Consciousness'' at Tucson, Arizona, USA ("Tucson V", April 8 - 12, 2002). This session was followed by a session on "Sensory Substitution II: Neural Plasticity in Crossmodal Perception" with presentations by  Mriganka Sur and  Alva Noë.

Featured by Wired News on April 12, 2002, in the article "Red, Blue, Green and Other Sounds" by Mark K. Anderson.

Slide 1: The vOICe at Tucson 2002
Slide 2: The vOICe talk overview
Photograph: Pat Fletcher, Peter Meijer and Paul Bach-y-Rita
Peter Meijer, Paul Bach-y-Rita and Pat Fletcher at Tucson 2002.
Photography: David Chalmers, at the first poster session.
Photograph: Peter Meijer, Pat Fletcher and David Chalmers
Peter Meijer, Pat Fletcher and David Chalmers at Tucson 2002.
Photography: David Chalmers, at the Radisson hotel lobby.


CONFERENCE PROGRAM

MONDAY – APRIL 8

Plenary 1: 8.30–10.40 am, Music Hall

PL1 Sensory Substitution I: Visual Consciousness in Blind Subjects?

Chair: David Chalmers

Bach-y-Rita, Paul, Tactile sensory substitution in blind subjects. 186

Meijer, Peter,  Seeing with sound for the blind: Is it vision?  MP3 format 187  (slides in 2.4 MB  PDF file)

Fletcher, Pat,  Seeing with sound: A journey into sight.  MP3 format 188  

Plenary 2: 11.10–12.35 pm, Music Hall

PL2 Sensory Substitution II: Neural Plasticity in Crossmodal Perception

Chair: Joseph Tolliver

Sur, Mriganka, Rewiring cortex. 121

Noë, Alva, Neural plasticity and consciousness: An enactive approach. 120


Abstract 187:

Seeing with sound for the blind: Is it vision?
By Peter Meijer

It is technically possible to convert video into audio while preserving a significant amount of visual information in the resulting - usually highly complex - sounds. If blind people can learn to mentally reconstruct the visual content of live camera views, as now carried by these sounds or "soundscapes", then they might be able to "see" with sound. The prerequisite of getting visual information into the brain of blind people can nowadays be fulfilled, but it remains to be established to what extent this will amount to "vision" after prolonged immersive usage to allow the brain to adapt as far as it can.

The subject currently brings the frontiers in many technical and scientific disciplines together, e.g., computer science, neuroscience, psychology and philosophy. The latest personal computer technology nowadays allows for easy (home) assembly of wearable vision systems for totally blind users by using only affordable and mature mass market components such as webcams, subnotebook PCs and stereo headphones. PCs are now fast enough to handle real-time video to audio conversion in software, as with "The vOICe Learning Edition", available as a free download from the Internet. Neuroscience research on crossmodal plasticity has in recent years shown that the "visual" (occipital) cortex of blind people can be activated by sound, thus making it more plausible that a camera-based auditory display, acting as a crossmodal sensory bypass, may indeed induce or restore a level of vision. However, at a fundamental level, the distinction between seeing and hearing has become totally blurred by the artificially created crossmodal mapping. Is the qualification "vision" or "hearing" determined mostly by the physical carrier of the information, or rather by the information content? We conjecture that it is the latter. Still, even if a blind person would functionally behave much like a sighted person in various "visual" tasks, and even if his or her "visual" cortex would provably become functionally involved (recruited), one could still argue and insist that the brain is "only" doing much extended and very sophisticated auditory processing to make good use of the camera sounds.

So we may indeed need to resort to (third-person statistics of) first-person accounts of subjective experiences in order to answer questions relating to important qualia, as in asking "Is it vision?", or perhaps rather asking "Does it 'feel' like vision?", or asking to what extent it is like normal vision, to what extent it is like hearing, and to what extent it is like neither. Therefore, the two presentations on "seeing with sound" at this conference will address various ("third-person") scientific issues as well as preliminary first-person experiences reported by a blind user of the "seeing with sound" technology.

More information, as well as free evaluation software for use with a webcam and stereo headphones, is available from the website http://www.seeingwithsound.com

The slides used in this presentation are available as a PDF file  tucson2002.pdf (2.4 MB). The audio part of the presentation by Peter Meijer is available online as 16 Kbps streaming  RealOne/RealPlayer audio and 32 Kbps streaming  MP3 audio (25 minutes, 33 seconds).

Abstract 188:

Seeing with sound: A journey into sight
By Pat Fletcher (a blind user of The vOICe)

I first became aware of the Seeing with Sound project in 1999. I was primarily interested in the program’s capability to determine color. I wanted a means by which I could identify the colors of the clothing in my wardrobe. did not realize at that time the full potential of the program nor how it would eventually so dramatically impact my life.

Initially beginning with a desktop, stereo headset and a scanner, I started to explore the many different features incorporated in the vOICe program. The soundscapes were unusually strange and confusing. It was like trying to discern the contents of a photograph using only your fingertips.

Eventually through experimenting by placing objects on the scan bed and comparing the soundscapes to the object in hand, I learn to relate and decode the information. Still the process was very slow and time consuming. I often stood on the threshold of giving up trying to comprehend these allusive sounding specters of sight teasing my mind’s eyes.

A true breakthrough began when I could leave the limiting boundaries of my desktop behind and use the program in a mobile environment. Clad in my armor of a notebook stuffed in a backpack, a close talk headset, and a web cam mounted on the brim of a ball cap, I took my first timid forays on to the pathways of becoming sighted.

I shall never forget the shock and joy of first glimpsing down my hallway and seeing blinds hanging on the window. Such a simple sight, yet after twenty years of blindness I was over whelmed. "It works - This program really works! I can see!" I spent the next following days and months re-discovering my new world. I had forgotten how intricately designed with detailed lines and patterns the world is created.

The evolution of my equipment from those early days is an on going process. The awkwardly built ball cap has been replaced with sophisticated hatcams, fanny packs, and video glasses built by security companies. I explored the world of "covert spy cams" in order to improve the cameras and conceal their presence. I have encountered the public’s curiosity and hostility despite explaining the meaning behind my wearing of this OD attire. It is a struggle to balance on the fine line of society’s acceptance and the wearing of the equipment.

Finally to address the question, " Is this vision?" Yes, vision, but with limitations. I presently can’t discern the finest details of a soundscape/image. I see only in black and white. If I am placed in an unfamiliar environment it is a struggle to decipher the meaning of the view till I am acquainted with the surroundings. My sight is constrained within the limitations of the hardware, the software, and my own abilities. As I cast my eyes toward TOMORROW’S horizons for the Seeing with Sound program, I can’t help but wonder where the journey into sight will lead.

The complete presentation by Pat Fletcher is available online as 16 Kbps streaming  RealOne/RealPlayer audio and 32 Kbps streaming  MP3 audio (23 minutes, 28 seconds).

These and other Tucson 2002 conference presentations are available on audio cassette from  Conference Recording Service, Inc. ( TSC22). See also the web pages on the earlier invited presentations at SIGGRAPH 98, VSPA 2001 and NIC2001. Related to the "qualia of vision" is also the paper by Richard Gregory at Tucson III (1998) titled  "Flagging the Present Moment with Qualia". A related philosophical theme is also "inverted qualia", which is about the experience of differently mapped sensory inputs - and of key importance also for sensory substitution options.

The Molyneux problem revisited using The vOICe?
The seventeenth-century philosopher William Molyneux, whose wife was blind, asked Molyneux problem: cube in VRML/X3D Molyneux problem: sphere in VRML/X3D his friend John Locke whether a man born blind, in case he recovered his sight, would be able to tell a cube from a sphere by sight alone, with previous sensory experience with cube and sphere limited to touch. Molyneux thought the answer was ``No'', and Locke agreed (in  ``An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'').

With visual objects observed as auditory objects via soundscapes from The vOICe, the situation is different, and the answer would be ``Yes'': it is certainly possible to hear (and understand) the roundedness of a sphere as compared to the more sudden sound transitions observed with the squareness of an upright cube. What does that mean? Could it mean that seeing-with-sound is for early-blind people actually closer to vision than having biological eyesight surgically restored? It is certainly closer to vision than the phenomenon called "blindsight" in that the visual content as encoded in sound can be consciously accessed. See also the sound samples in the Powerpoint file  "molyneux.ppt" (750 K).

The Tucson 2002 conference is covered in the book "Consciousness: An Introduction" (2004; e.g., page 267) by  Susan Blackmore, and briefly discussed in book chapter 4 (page 61)  Global workspace theory of consciousness: toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience by Bernard Baars, in "The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology", Steven Laureys (Ed.), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 150, pp. 45-53, 2005. Perceptual and philosophical issues concerning The vOICe are also discussed in the book  Seeing Red - A Study in Consciousness (2006) by  Nicholas Humphrey.

Copyright © 1996 - 2024 Peter B.L. Meijer